Skip to content

Gebrauchshäufigkeit und Reversibilität von Binomialen (Paarformeln) im Slowenischen

Emmerich Kelih


Pages 104 - 121

DOI https://doi.org/10.13173/wienslavjahr.8.2020.0104




The paper ‘Usage frequency and reversibility of Slovene binomials’ focuses on
Slovene binomials. It begins with a general discussion of definitions and
terminology. In the second part the results of my own empirical studies of
Slovene binomials are given. Special attention is paid to the occurrence
(frequency) of binomials in contemporary Slovene reference corpora (FidaPLUS)
and in particular to the different degrees of the variability of the components.
Based on frequency and by means of appropriate statistical methods three
different subgroups of binomials are proposed (irreversible, highly and rarely
reversible binomials). Reversibility is without a doubt an important feature of
binomials. However, as is shown in empirical analysis, it occurs less frequently
than expected.

Wien

1 Abraham 1950: Richard M. Abraham, Fixed order of coordinates: A study in lexicography, Modern Language Journal, 34, 276–287.

2 Arhar Holdt 2011: Špela Arhar Holdt, Luščenje besednih zvez iz besedilnega korpusa z uporabo dvodelnih in tridelnig oblikoskladenjskih vzorcev. Ljubljana.

3 Arhar / Gorjanc 2007: Špela Arhar, Vojko Gorjanc, Korpus FidaPLUS: Nova generacija slovenskega referenčnega korpusa, Jezik in slovstvo, 52 (2), 95–110.

4 Arppe / Gilquin / Glynn / Hilpert / Zeschel 2010: Antti Arppe / Gaëtanelle Gilquin / Dylan Glynn / Martin Hilpert / Arne Zeschel, Cognitive Corpus Linguistics: five points of debate on current theory and methodology, Corpora 5 (1), 1–27.

5 Benor / Levy 2006: Sarah Bunin Benor / Roger Levy, The Chicken or the Egg? A Probabilistic Analysis of English Binomials, Language, 82 (2), 233–278.

6 Berginc Logar et al. 2012: Nataša Berginc Logar / Miha Grčar / Marko Brakus / Tomaž Erjavec / Špela Arhar Holdt / Simon Krek, Korpusi slovenskega jezika: Gigafida, KRES, ccGigafida in ccKRES: gradnja, vsebina, uporaba. Ljubljana.

7 Birdsong 1995: David Birdsong, Iconicity, markedness, and processing constraints in frozen locutions. In: Marge E. Landsberg (ed.): Syntactic Iconicity and Linguistic Freezes: The Human Dimension. Berlin-New York, 31–45.

8 Bittner 1990: Andreas Bittner, Eine unendliche Geschichte? Nochmal zum Verhältnis von Suppletion und Natürlichkeit. In: Norbert Boretzky / Werner Enninger / Thomas Stolz (Hg.): Spielarten der Natürlichkeit – Spielarten der Ökonomie. 2 Halbband. Bochum, 227–247. (Bochum-Essener Beiträge zur Sprachwandelforschung, 8).

9 Blumenthal-Dramé 2012: Alice Blumenthal-Dramé, Entrenchment in Usage-Based Theories. What Corpus Data Do and Do Not Reveal About The Mind. Berlin-Boston (Topics in English Linguistics, 83).

10 Bolinger 1962: Dwight Bolinger, Binomials and pitch accent, Lingua 11, 34–44.

11 Burger 1982: Harald Burger, Handbuch der Phraseologie. Berlin-New York.

12 Bußmann 1990: Hadumod Bußmann (Hg.), Lexikon der Sprachwissenschaft. Zweite, völlig neue bearbeitete Auflage. Stuttgart.

13 Bybee 2007: Joan Bybee, Frequency of use and the organization of language. Oxford.

14 Bybee / Hopper 2001: Joan Bybee / Paul Hopper, Introduction to frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. In: Joan Bybee / Paul Hopper (eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam-Philadelphia, 1–24 (Typological studies in language, 45).

15 Cooper / Ross 1975: William E. Cooper / John R. Ross, World order. In: Robin Grossman / James San / Timothy Vance (eds.): Papers from the parasession on Functionalism. Chicago, 63–111.

16 Divjak / Caldwell-Harris 2015: Dagmar Divjak / Catherine L. Caldwell-Harris, Frequency and entrenchment. In: Ewa Dabrowska / Dagmar Divjak (eds.): Handbook of cognitive linguistics. Berlin, 53–75 (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 39).

17 Fenk-Oczlon 1989: Gertraud Fenk-Oczlon, Word frequency and word order in freezes, Linguistics 27, 517–556.

18 Fenk-Oczlon 2001: Gertraud Fenk-Oczlon, Familarity, information flow, and linguistics form. In: Joan Bybee / Paul Hopper (eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam-Philadelphia, 431–448 (Typological studies in language, 45).

19 Geeraerts 2015: Dirk Geeraerts, Lexical semantics. In: Ewa Dabrowska / Dagmar Divjak (eds.): Handbook of cognitive linguistics. Berlin, 273–295 (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 39).

20 Grzybek 2012: Peter Grzybek, Facetten des parömiologischen Rubik-Würfels. Kenntnis ≡ Bekanntheit [⇔ Verwendung ≈ Frequenz] ?!? In: Kathrin Steyer (Hg.): Sprichwörter multilingual. Theoretische, empirische und angewandte Aspekte der modernen Parömiologie. Tübingen, 99–138.

21 Keber 2000: Janez Keber, Raziskovanje slovenske frazeologije – sedanje stanje in zasnova frazeološkega slovarja, Jezikovni zapiski 6, 81–116.

22 Keber 2003: Janez Keber, Poskusni zvezek slovenskega frazeološkega slovarja. Ljubljana.

23 Keber 2011: Janez Keber, Slovar slovenskih frazemov. Ljubljana.

24 Kelih 2017: Emmerich Kelih, Reversibilität von Paarformeln und Binomialen: Methodologische Aspekte, Glottotheory 8 (2), 191–201.

25 Korpus slovenskega jezika FidaPLUS: <https://www.sketchengine.eu/fida-plus-corpus/>.

26 Kržišnik 2004: Erika Kržišnik, [Rez.]: <Keber 2003>, Slavistična revija 52 (2), 199–208.

27 Landsberg 1995: Marge E. Landsberg, Semantic constraints on phonologically independent freezes. In: Marge E. Landsberg (ed.): Syntactic Iconicity and Linguistic Freezes: The Human Dimension. Berlin-New York, 65–78.

28 Lohmann 2014: Arne Lohmann, English Coordinate Constructions. A Processing Perspective on Constituent Order. Cambridge (Studies in English language).

29 Malkiel 1959: Yakov Malkiel, Studies in irreversible binomials, Lingua 8, 112–160.

30 Mehl 2018: Seth Mehl, What we talk about when we talk about corpus frequency: The example of polysemous verbs with light and concrete senses, Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 0. DOI: 10.1515/cllt-2017-0039.

31 Mel‘čuk 2000, Igor Mel‘čuk, Suppletion. In: Geert Booij / Christian Lehmann / Joachim Mugdan (Hg.): Morphologie / Morphology. Berlin, 510–522 (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 17/1].

32 Motschenbacher 2013: Heiko Motschenbacher, Gentlemen before Ladies? A Corpus-Based Study of Conjunct Order in Personal Binomials, Journal of English Linguistics 41, 212–242.

33 Mollin 2014: Sandra Mollin, The (Ir)reversibility of English Binomials. Corpus, constraints, developments. Amsterdam-Philadelphia (Studies in corpus linguistics, 64).

34 Müller 1997: Gereon Müller, Beschränkungen für Binomialverbindungen im Deutschen, Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 16 (1/2), 5–51.

35 Nöth 1993: Winfried Nöth, Iconicity of symmetries and asymmetries in syntactic coordination. In: Christoph Küper (Hg.): Von der Sprache zur Literatur. Motiviertheit im sprachlichen und im poetischen Kode. Tübingen, 23–36 (Probleme der Semiotik, 14).

36 Pinker / Birdsong 1979: Steve Pinker / David Birdsong, Speaker's sensitivity of rules of frozen word order, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18, 497–508.

37 Prün 2005: Claudia Prün, Das Werk von G. K. Zipf. In: Reinhard Köhler / Gabriel Altmann / Rajmund G. Piotrowski (Hg.): Quantitative Linguistik. Quantitative Linguistics. Ein internationales Handbuch. An International Handbook. Berlin-New York, 142–152 (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 27).

38 Rojs 2012: Jurij Rojs, [Rez.] <Keber 2011>, Jezikoslovni zapiski 181, 209–212.

39 Southern 2000: Mark R. V. Southern, Formulaic Binomials, Morphosymbolism, and Behaghel's Law: The Grammatical Status of Expressive Iconicity, American Journal of Germanic Linguistics and Literatures 12 (2), 251–279.

40 Toporišič 1996: Jože Toporišič, Dvojčiči in podobne frazeološke zgradbe v slovenščini, Slavistična revija 44 (3), 269–278.

41 Toporišič 1998: Jože Toporišič, Zwillings- und ähnliche Strukturen im Slowenischen. In: Wolfgang Eismann (Hg.): Europhras 95: Europäische Phraseologie im Vergleich: Gemeinsames Erbe und kulturelle Vielfalt. Bochum, 795–806 (Studien zur Phraseologie und Parömiologie, 15).

42 Wälchli 2009: Bernhard Wälchli, Co-compounds and natural coordination. Oxford.

43 Wright / Hay / Bent 2005: Saundra K. Wright / Jennifer Hay / Tessa Bent, Ladies First? Phonology, Frequency, and the Naming, Linguistics 43 (3), 531–561.

Share


Export Citation